smoothies: be good for breakfast

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents drink
Weight: 0.31
Siblings smoothie
Weight: 0.28
, carbonated beverage
Weight: 0.28
, chocolate milk
Weight: 0.28
, soda
Weight: 0.28
, apple juice
Weight: 0.27

Related properties

Property Similarity
be good for breakfast 1.00
be important for breakfast 0.97

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(smoothies, be good for breakfast) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(smoothie, be good for breakfast)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(smoothies, be good for breakfast) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(smoothie, be good for breakfast) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(smoothie, be good for breakfast)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(smoothies, be good for breakfast) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(smoothies, be good for breakfast)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(smoothies, be good for breakfast) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(smoothies, be important for breakfast)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(smoothies, be good for breakfast) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(smoothies, be important for breakfast)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(smoothies, be good for breakfast) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(smoothies, be important for breakfast)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(smoothies, be good for breakfast) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(smoothies, be important for breakfast)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(smoothies, be good for breakfast) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(smoothies, be good for breakfast) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(smoothies, be good for breakfast)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(smoothies, be good for breakfast) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(smoothies, be good for breakfast)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(smoothies, be good for breakfast) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(smoothie, be good for breakfast)