smoothies: be high in smartpoints

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents drink
Weight: 0.31
Siblings smoothie
Weight: 0.28
, carbonated beverage
Weight: 0.28
, chocolate milk
Weight: 0.28
, soda
Weight: 0.28
, apple juice
Weight: 0.27

Related properties

Property Similarity
be high in smartpoints 1.00
be high in points 0.83
be high in smart points 0.80
be high in sugar 0.78
has degree low 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(smoothies, be high in smartpoints)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(carbonated beverage, has degree low)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(smoothies, be high in smartpoints)
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(carbonated beverage, has degree low)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(carbonated beverage, has degree low)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(smoothies, be high in smartpoints)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(smoothies, be high in smartpoints)

Similarity expansion

0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(smoothies, be high in smartpoints)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(smoothies, be high in sugar)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(smoothies, be high in smartpoints)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(smoothies, be high in sugar)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(smoothies, be high in smartpoints)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(smoothies, be high in sugar)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(smoothies, be high in smartpoints)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(smoothies, be high in sugar)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(smoothies, be high in smartpoints)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(smoothies, be high in points)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(smoothies, be high in smartpoints)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(smoothies, be high in smart points)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(smoothies, be high in smartpoints)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(smoothies, be high in points)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(smoothies, be high in smartpoints)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(smoothies, be high in smart points)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(smoothies, be high in smartpoints)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(smoothies, be high in points)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(smoothies, be high in smartpoints)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(smoothies, be high in smart points)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(smoothies, be high in smartpoints)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(smoothies, be high in points)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(smoothies, be high in smartpoints)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(smoothies, be high in smart points)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(smoothies, be high in smartpoints)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(smoothies, be high in smartpoints)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(smoothies, be high in smartpoints)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(smoothies, be high in smartpoints)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(smoothies, be high in smartpoints)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(smoothies, be high in smartpoints)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(carbonated beverage, has degree low)