smoothies: be worse than fruit

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents drink
Weight: 0.31
Siblings smoothie
Weight: 0.28
, carbonated beverage
Weight: 0.28
, chocolate milk
Weight: 0.28
, soda
Weight: 0.28
, apple juice
Weight: 0.27

Related properties

Property Similarity
be worse than fruit 1.00
be worse than whole fruit 0.96
be less healthy than fruit 0.90
be as good as fruit 0.87
be better than water 0.80
be better than white milk 0.80
react with grape juice 0.79
be cheaper than milk 0.79
be better than regular milk 0.78
be much thicker than milk 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.31
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(drink, be better than water)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(smoothies, be worse than fruit)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(smoothies, be worse than fruit)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(drink, be better than water)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(smoothies, be worse than fruit)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(drink, be better than water)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(smoothies, be worse than fruit)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(chocolate milk, be better than white milk)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(smoothies, be worse than fruit)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(chocolate milk, be cheaper than milk)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(smoothies, be worse than fruit)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(chocolate milk, be better than regular milk)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(smoothies, be worse than fruit)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(chocolate milk, be much thicker than milk)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(drink, be better than water)
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(smoothies, be worse than fruit)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(smoothies, be worse than fruit)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(smoothies, be worse than fruit)
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(chocolate milk, be much thicker than milk)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(chocolate milk, be much thicker than milk)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(smoothies, be worse than fruit)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(chocolate milk, be better than white milk)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(chocolate milk, be better than white milk)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(smoothies, be worse than fruit)
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(chocolate milk, be better than regular milk)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(chocolate milk, be better than regular milk)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(smoothies, be worse than fruit)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(chocolate milk, be cheaper than milk)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(chocolate milk, be cheaper than milk)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(smoothies, be worse than fruit)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(smoothies, be worse than fruit)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(smoothies, be worse than fruit)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(smoothies, be worse than whole fruit)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(smoothies, be worse than fruit)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(smoothies, be less healthy than fruit)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(smoothies, be worse than fruit)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(smoothies, be as good as fruit)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(smoothies, be worse than fruit)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(smoothies, be worse than whole fruit)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(smoothies, be worse than fruit)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(smoothies, be worse than whole fruit)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(smoothies, be worse than fruit)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(smoothies, be worse than whole fruit)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(smoothies, be worse than fruit)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(smoothies, be less healthy than fruit)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(smoothies, be worse than fruit)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(smoothies, be as good as fruit)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(smoothies, be worse than fruit)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(smoothies, be less healthy than fruit)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(smoothies, be worse than fruit)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(smoothies, be as good as fruit)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(smoothies, be worse than fruit)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(smoothies, be less healthy than fruit)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(smoothies, be worse than fruit)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(smoothies, be as good as fruit)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(smoothies, be worse than fruit)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(smoothies, be worse than fruit)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(smoothies, be worse than fruit)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(smoothies, be worse than fruit)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(smoothies, be worse than fruit)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(smoothies, be worse than fruit)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(drink, be better than water)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(smoothies, be worse than fruit)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(chocolate milk, be much thicker than milk)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(smoothies, be worse than fruit)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(chocolate milk, be better than white milk)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(smoothies, be worse than fruit)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(chocolate milk, be better than regular milk)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(smoothies, be worse than fruit)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(chocolate milk, be cheaper than milk)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(smoothies, be worse than fruit)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(drink, be better than water)