smoothies: count on weight watchers

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents drink
Weight: 0.31
Siblings smoothie
Weight: 0.28
, carbonated beverage
Weight: 0.28
, chocolate milk
Weight: 0.28
, soda
Weight: 0.28
, apple juice
Weight: 0.27

Related properties

Property Similarity
count on weight watchers 1.00
have on weight watchers points 0.93
be more points on weight watchers 0.92
have weight watchers points 0.92

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(smoothies, count on weight watchers)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(smoothies, count on weight watchers)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(smoothies, count on weight watchers)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(smoothies, be more points on weight watchers)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(smoothies, count on weight watchers)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(smoothies, be more points on weight watchers)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(smoothies, count on weight watchers)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(smoothies, be more points on weight watchers)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(smoothies, count on weight watchers)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(smoothies, have weight watchers points)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(smoothies, count on weight watchers)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(smoothies, have on weight watchers points)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(smoothies, count on weight watchers)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(smoothies, have on weight watchers points)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(smoothies, count on weight watchers)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(smoothies, have on weight watchers points)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(smoothies, count on weight watchers)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(smoothies, have weight watchers points)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(smoothies, count on weight watchers)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(smoothies, be more points on weight watchers)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(smoothies, count on weight watchers)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(smoothies, have weight watchers points)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(smoothies, count on weight watchers)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(smoothies, have on weight watchers points)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(smoothies, count on weight watchers)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(smoothies, have weight watchers points)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(smoothies, count on weight watchers)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(smoothies, count on weight watchers)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(smoothies, count on weight watchers)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(smoothies, count on weight watchers)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(smoothies, count on weight watchers)