snack: support development of children

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents item
Weight: 0.62
, salad
Weight: 0.59
, drink
Weight: 0.57
, activity
Weight: 0.56
Siblings candy bar
Weight: 0.73
, potato chip
Weight: 0.72
, hot chocolate
Weight: 0.72
, pretzel
Weight: 0.71
, soft drink
Weight: 0.71

Related properties

Property Similarity
support development of children 1.00
support social development of children 0.96
support development 0.92
support social development 0.89

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(snack, support development of children)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(snack, support development of children)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(snack, support development of children)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(snack, support social development of children)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(snack, support development of children)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(snack, support social development of children)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(snack, support development of children)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(snack, support social development of children)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(snack, support development of children)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(snack, support development)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(snack, support development of children)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(snack, support social development)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(snack, support development of children)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(snack, support development)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(snack, support development of children)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(snack, support social development)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(snack, support development of children)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(snack, support social development of children)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(snack, support development of children)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(snack, support development)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(snack, support development of children)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(snack, support social development)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(snack, support development of children)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(snack, support development)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(snack, support development of children)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(snack, support social development)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(snack, support development of children)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(snack, support development of children)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(snack, support development of children)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(snack, support development of children)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(snack, support development of children)