snail: have shells

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents organism
Weight: 0.69
, creature
Weight: 0.68
, mollusk
Weight: 0.64
, insect
Weight: 0.63
, invertebrate
Weight: 0.62
Siblings lizard
Weight: 0.38
, frog
Weight: 0.37
, dung beetle
Weight: 0.37
, caterpillar
Weight: 0.37
, tree frog
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
have shells 1.00
get shells 0.98
make shells 0.97
need shells 0.97
go in shells 0.97
form shells 0.96
leave shells 0.95
come out of shells 0.95
stay in shells 0.93
get bigger shells 0.91

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(mollusk, have shells)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(snail, have shells)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(snail, have shells)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(mollusk, have shells)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(snail, have shells)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(mollusk, have shells)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(mollusk, have shells)
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(snail, have shells)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(snail, have shells)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(snail, have shells)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(snail, have shells)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(snail, have shells)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(snail, need shells)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(snail, have shells)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(snail, need shells)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(snail, have shells)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(snail, need shells)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(snail, have shells)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(snail, need shells)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(snail, have shells)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(snail, have shells)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(snail, have shells)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(snail, have shells)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(snail, have shells)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(snail, have shells)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(mollusk, have shells)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(snail, have shells)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(mollusk, have shells)