snake: be at field

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents reptile
Weight: 0.70
, creature
Weight: 0.70
, predator
Weight: 0.69
, pet
Weight: 0.69
, animal
Weight: 0.63
Siblings anaconda
Weight: 0.65
, gopher
Weight: 0.55
, cobra
Weight: 0.54
, kangaroo rat
Weight: 0.52
, lizard
Weight: 0.40

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at field 1.00
be at field under rock 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(snake, be at field) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(lizard, be at field under rock)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.24
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(snake, be at field) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(lizard, be at field under rock) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(lizard, be at field under rock)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(snake, be at field) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(snake, be at field)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(snake, be at field) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(snake, be at field) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(snake, be at field)

Typical implies Plausible

0.15
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(snake, be at field) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(snake, be at field)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(snake, be at field) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(lizard, be at field under rock)