snap: is expensive

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents game
Weight: 0.61
, group
Weight: 0.56
, method
Weight: 0.55
, organization
Weight: 0.54
, service
Weight: 0.53
Siblings football game
Weight: 0.33
, soccer ball
Weight: 0.33
, hockey game
Weight: 0.33
, computer game
Weight: 0.32
, game show
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
is expensive 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(snap, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(soccer ball, is expensive)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(snap, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(football game, is expensive)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(snap, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(computer game, is expensive)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(snap, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(computer game, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(computer game, is expensive)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(snap, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(football game, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(football game, is expensive)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(snap, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(soccer ball, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(soccer ball, is expensive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(snap, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(snap, is expensive)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(snap, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(snap, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(snap, is expensive)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(snap, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(snap, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(snap, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(football game, is expensive)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(snap, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(soccer ball, is expensive)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(snap, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(computer game, is expensive)