sneaker: have loops on back

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents shoe
Weight: 0.62
, product
Weight: 0.58
, thing
Weight: 0.58
, style
Weight: 0.53
Siblings converse
Weight: 0.47
, nike
Weight: 0.33
, loafer
Weight: 0.33
, sock
Weight: 0.32
, jeans
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
have loops on back 1.00
have loops 0.96

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.58
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(shoe, have loops on back) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(sneaker, have loops on back)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(sneaker, have loops on back) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(shoe, have loops on back)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.52
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(sneaker, have loops on back) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(shoe, have loops on back)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(shoe, have loops on back) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(sneaker, have loops on back) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(sneaker, have loops on back)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(sneaker, have loops on back) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(sneaker, have loops on back)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(sneaker, have loops on back) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(sneaker, have loops)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(sneaker, have loops on back) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(sneaker, have loops)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(sneaker, have loops on back) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(sneaker, have loops)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(sneaker, have loops on back) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(sneaker, have loops)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(sneaker, have loops on back) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(sneaker, have loops on back) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(sneaker, have loops on back)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(sneaker, have loops on back) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(sneaker, have loops on back)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(sneaker, have loops on back) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(shoe, have loops on back)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(sneaker, have loops on back) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(shoe, have loops on back)