snoring: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.54
, breathing
Weight: 0.53
, sound
Weight: 0.53
, noise
Weight: 0.52
, symptom
Weight: 0.50
Siblings sleep apnea
Weight: 0.68
, insomnia
Weight: 0.33
, loud noise
Weight: 0.32
, angina
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
affect quality 0.81
has quality noise 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(snoring, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(sleep apnea, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(snoring, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(angina, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(snoring, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(insomnia, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(snoring, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(sleep apnea, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(sleep apnea, has quality bad)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(snoring, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(insomnia, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(insomnia, has quality bad)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(snoring, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(angina, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(angina, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(snoring, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(snoring, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(snoring, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(snoring, affect quality)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(snoring, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(snoring, has quality noise)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(snoring, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(snoring, affect quality)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(snoring, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(snoring, affect quality)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(snoring, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(snoring, has quality noise)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(snoring, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(snoring, has quality noise)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(snoring, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(snoring, affect quality)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(snoring, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(snoring, has quality noise)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(snoring, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(snoring, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(snoring, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(snoring, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(snoring, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(snoring, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(sleep apnea, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(snoring, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(angina, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(snoring, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(insomnia, has quality bad)