snow leopard: compete animals

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents leopard
Weight: 0.70
, species
Weight: 0.68
, animal
Weight: 0.67
, carnivore
Weight: 0.67
Siblings snowy owl
Weight: 0.37
, snow goose
Weight: 0.37
, grizzly bear
Weight: 0.37
, arctic fox
Weight: 0.37
, cougar
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
compete animals 1.00
compete agaisnt other animals 0.86
eat animals 0.81
communicate with other animals 0.79
communicate with animals 0.79
eat domestic animals 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, eat animals)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(snow leopard, compete animals)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(snow leopard, compete animals)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(animal, eat animals)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(snow leopard, compete animals)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(animal, eat animals)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, eat animals)
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(snow leopard, compete animals)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(snow leopard, compete animals)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(snow leopard, compete animals)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(snow leopard, compete animals)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(snow leopard, compete animals)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(snow leopard, eat animals)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(snow leopard, compete animals)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(snow leopard, eat animals)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(snow leopard, compete animals)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(snow leopard, eat animals)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(snow leopard, compete animals)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(snow leopard, compete agaisnt other animals)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(snow leopard, compete animals)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(snow leopard, eat animals)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(snow leopard, compete animals)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(snow leopard, compete animals)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(snow leopard, compete animals)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(snow leopard, compete animals)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(snow leopard, compete animals)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.15
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(snow leopard, compete animals)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(animal, eat animals)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(snow leopard, compete animals)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(animal, eat animals)