snow leopard: develop from cub

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents leopard
Weight: 0.70
, species
Weight: 0.68
, animal
Weight: 0.67
, carnivore
Weight: 0.67
Siblings snowy owl
Weight: 0.37
, snow goose
Weight: 0.37
, grizzly bear
Weight: 0.37
, arctic fox
Weight: 0.37
, cougar
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
develop from cub 1.00
develop from cub to adult 0.97
kill cubs 0.87

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(snow leopard, develop from cub)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(grizzly bear, kill cubs)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(snow leopard, develop from cub)
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(grizzly bear, kill cubs)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(grizzly bear, kill cubs)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(snow leopard, develop from cub)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(snow leopard, develop from cub)

Similarity expansion

0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(snow leopard, develop from cub)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(snow leopard, develop from cub to adult)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(snow leopard, develop from cub)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(snow leopard, kill cubs)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(snow leopard, develop from cub)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(snow leopard, develop from cub to adult)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(snow leopard, develop from cub)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(snow leopard, kill cubs)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(snow leopard, develop from cub)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(snow leopard, develop from cub to adult)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(snow leopard, develop from cub)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(snow leopard, kill cubs)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(snow leopard, develop from cub)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(snow leopard, develop from cub to adult)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(snow leopard, develop from cub)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(snow leopard, kill cubs)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(snow leopard, develop from cub)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(snow leopard, develop from cub)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(snow leopard, develop from cub)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(snow leopard, develop from cub)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(snow leopard, develop from cub)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(snow leopard, develop from cub)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(grizzly bear, kill cubs)