snow: cover grind

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents bad weather
Weight: 0.64
, emergency
Weight: 0.63
, cold weather
Weight: 0.57
, element
Weight: 0.56
, material
Weight: 0.56
Siblings snowstorm
Weight: 0.37
, rain
Weight: 0.35
, fog
Weight: 0.35
, storm
Weight: 0.34
, winter
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
cover grind 1.00
be at grind 0.90
be used to wet grind 0.84
wet grind 0.84
cause muddy grind 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(snow, cover grind) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(storm, be used to wet grind)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(snow, cover grind) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(rain, wet grind)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(snow, cover grind) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(rain, cause muddy grind)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(snow, cover grind) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(rain, wet grind) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(rain, wet grind)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(snow, cover grind) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(rain, cause muddy grind) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(rain, cause muddy grind)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(snow, cover grind) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(storm, be used to wet grind) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(storm, be used to wet grind)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(snow, cover grind) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(snow, cover grind)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(snow, cover grind) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(snow, be at grind)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(snow, cover grind) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(snow, be at grind)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(snow, cover grind) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(snow, be at grind)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(snow, cover grind) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(snow, be at grind)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(snow, cover grind) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(snow, cover grind) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(snow, cover grind)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(snow, cover grind) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(snow, cover grind)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(snow, cover grind) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(rain, wet grind)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(snow, cover grind) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(storm, be used to wet grind)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(snow, cover grind) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(rain, cause muddy grind)