snow: has state wet

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents bad weather
Weight: 0.64
, emergency
Weight: 0.63
, variable
Weight: 0.58
, cold weather
Weight: 0.57
, element
Weight: 0.56
Siblings snowstorm
Weight: 0.37
, rain
Weight: 0.35
, fog
Weight: 0.35
, precipitation
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
has state wet 1.00
be better than rain 0.77
is cold 0.76
be cold 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(snow, has state wet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(rain, has state wet)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(snow, has state wet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(rain, be cold)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(snow, has state wet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(fog, is cold)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(snow, has state wet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(rain, is cold)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(snow, has state wet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(rain, has state wet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(rain, has state wet)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(snow, has state wet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(rain, is cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(rain, is cold)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(snow, has state wet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(fog, is cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(fog, is cold)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(snow, has state wet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(rain, be cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(rain, be cold)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(snow, has state wet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(snow, has state wet)

Similarity expansion

0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(snow, has state wet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(snow, be cold)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(snow, has state wet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(snow, is cold)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(snow, has state wet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(snow, be better than rain)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(snow, has state wet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(snow, be better than rain)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(snow, has state wet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(snow, be better than rain)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(snow, has state wet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(snow, is cold)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(snow, has state wet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(snow, be better than rain)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(snow, has state wet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(snow, be cold)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(snow, has state wet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(snow, is cold)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(snow, has state wet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(snow, be cold)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(snow, has state wet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(snow, be cold)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(snow, has state wet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(snow, is cold)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(snow, has state wet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(snow, has state wet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(snow, has state wet)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(snow, has state wet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(snow, has state wet)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(snow, has state wet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(rain, has state wet)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(snow, has state wet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(fog, is cold)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(snow, has state wet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(rain, be cold)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(snow, has state wet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(rain, is cold)