snowflake: have intricate designs

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents crystal
Weight: 0.62
, thing
Weight: 0.61
, design
Weight: 0.56
, shape
Weight: 0.53
, pattern
Weight: 0.52
Siblings ice cube
Weight: 0.33
, snowman
Weight: 0.33
, raindrop
Weight: 0.32
, groundhog day
Weight: 0.32
, flower arrangement
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
have intricate designs 1.00
have designs 0.88
is geometric 0.77
is geometrical 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(pattern, is geometric)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(snowflake, have intricate designs)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(snowflake, have intricate designs)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(pattern, is geometric)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(snowflake, have intricate designs)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(pattern, is geometric)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(pattern, is geometric)
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(snowflake, have intricate designs)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(snowflake, have intricate designs)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(snowflake, have intricate designs)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(snowflake, have intricate designs)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(snowflake, have intricate designs)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(snowflake, is geometric)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(snowflake, have intricate designs)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(snowflake, is geometrical)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(snowflake, have intricate designs)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(snowflake, is geometrical)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(snowflake, have intricate designs)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(snowflake, is geometric)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(snowflake, have intricate designs)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(snowflake, have designs)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(snowflake, have intricate designs)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(snowflake, is geometrical)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(snowflake, have intricate designs)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(snowflake, is geometric)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(snowflake, have intricate designs)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(snowflake, have designs)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(snowflake, have intricate designs)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(snowflake, have designs)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(snowflake, have intricate designs)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(snowflake, is geometrical)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(snowflake, have intricate designs)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(snowflake, have designs)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(snowflake, have intricate designs)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(snowflake, is geometric)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(snowflake, have intricate designs)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(snowflake, have intricate designs)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(snowflake, have intricate designs)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(snowflake, have intricate designs)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(snowflake, have intricate designs)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(snowflake, have intricate designs)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(pattern, is geometric)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(snowflake, have intricate designs)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(pattern, is geometric)