soccer field: have stripes

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents field
Weight: 0.66
, playground
Weight: 0.61
, area
Weight: 0.60
, sport
Weight: 0.59
, community
Weight: 0.59
Siblings baseball field
Weight: 0.84
, football field
Weight: 0.41
, football team
Weight: 0.37
, playing field
Weight: 0.37
, soccer
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
have stripes 1.00
be different shades of green 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(soccer field, have stripes)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(baseball field, have stripes)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(soccer field, have stripes)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(football field, have stripes)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(soccer field, have stripes)
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(football field, have stripes)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(football field, have stripes)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(soccer field, have stripes)
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(baseball field, have stripes)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(baseball field, have stripes)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(soccer field, have stripes)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(soccer field, have stripes)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(soccer field, have stripes)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(soccer field, be different shades of green)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(soccer field, have stripes)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(soccer field, be different shades of green)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(soccer field, have stripes)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(soccer field, be different shades of green)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(soccer field, have stripes)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(soccer field, be different shades of green)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(soccer field, have stripes)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(soccer field, have stripes)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(soccer field, have stripes)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(soccer field, have stripes)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(soccer field, have stripes)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(soccer field, have stripes)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(baseball field, have stripes)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(soccer field, have stripes)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(football field, have stripes)