soccer player: cut holes in socks

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents athlete
Weight: 0.71
, soccer
Weight: 0.66
, student
Weight: 0.62
, celebrity
Weight: 0.57
Siblings basketball player
Weight: 0.77
, football player
Weight: 0.42
, hockey player
Weight: 0.41
, tennis player
Weight: 0.41
, lacrosse player
Weight: 0.39

Related properties

Property Similarity
cut holes in socks 1.00
have holes in socks 0.96
pull up shorts 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(soccer player, cut holes in socks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(basketball player, pull up shorts)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(soccer player, cut holes in socks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(basketball player, pull up shorts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(basketball player, pull up shorts)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(soccer player, cut holes in socks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(soccer player, cut holes in socks)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(soccer player, cut holes in socks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(soccer player, have holes in socks)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(soccer player, cut holes in socks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(soccer player, have holes in socks)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(soccer player, cut holes in socks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(soccer player, have holes in socks)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(soccer player, cut holes in socks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(soccer player, have holes in socks)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(soccer player, cut holes in socks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(soccer player, pull up shorts)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(soccer player, cut holes in socks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(soccer player, cut holes in socks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(soccer player, cut holes in socks)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(soccer player, cut holes in socks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(soccer player, cut holes in socks)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(soccer player, cut holes in socks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(basketball player, pull up shorts)