soccer: be better than afl

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents soccer player
Weight: 0.66
, sport
Weight: 0.63
, game
Weight: 0.60
, topic
Weight: 0.59
, basketball
Weight: 0.59
Siblings lacrosse
Weight: 0.55
, soccer ball
Weight: 0.38
, basketball player
Weight: 0.38
, hockey game
Weight: 0.38
, football game
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better than afl 1.00
be better than american football 0.85
be better than football 0.82
be better than rugby 0.81
be more popular than rugby 0.79
be better than hockey 0.78
be better than baseball 0.78
be better than netball 0.77
be better than basketball 0.77
be different than football 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.24
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(basketball, be better than football) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(soccer, be better than afl)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(basketball, be better than baseball) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(soccer, be better than afl)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(basketball, be better than netball) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(soccer, be better than afl)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(soccer, be better than afl) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(basketball, be better than football)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(soccer, be better than afl) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(basketball, be better than baseball)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(soccer, be better than afl) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(basketball, be better than netball)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(soccer, be better than afl) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(basketball, be better than football)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(soccer, be better than afl) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(basketball, be better than baseball)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(soccer, be better than afl) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(basketball, be better than netball)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(soccer, be better than afl) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(lacrosse, be better than baseball)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(basketball, be better than football) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(soccer, be better than afl) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(soccer, be better than afl)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(basketball, be better than baseball) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(soccer, be better than afl) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(soccer, be better than afl)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(basketball, be better than netball) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(soccer, be better than afl) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(soccer, be better than afl)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(soccer, be better than afl) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(lacrosse, be better than baseball) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(lacrosse, be better than baseball)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(soccer, be better than afl) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(soccer, be better than afl)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(soccer, be better than afl) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(soccer, be better than american football)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(soccer, be better than afl) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(soccer, be better than american football)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(soccer, be better than afl) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(soccer, be better than american football)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(soccer, be better than afl) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(soccer, be better than football)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(soccer, be better than afl) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(soccer, be better than football)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(soccer, be better than afl) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(soccer, be better than afl) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(soccer, be better than afl)

Typical implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(soccer, be better than afl) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(soccer, be better than afl)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(soccer, be better than afl) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(basketball, be better than football)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(soccer, be better than afl) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(basketball, be better than baseball)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(soccer, be better than afl) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(basketball, be better than netball)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(soccer, be better than afl) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(lacrosse, be better than baseball)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(soccer, be better than afl) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(basketball, be better than football)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(soccer, be better than afl) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(basketball, be better than baseball)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(soccer, be better than afl) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(basketball, be better than netball)