social: has state health

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents community
Weight: 0.63
, program
Weight: 0.61
, concept
Weight: 0.59
, company
Weight: 0.58
, aspect
Weight: 0.58
Siblings youth
Weight: 0.33
, culture
Weight: 0.32
, gender
Weight: 0.32
, other people
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
has state health 1.00
has state security 0.79
has state development 0.78
has state problems 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(social, has state health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(social, has state health)

Similarity expansion

0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(social, has state health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(social, has state security)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(social, has state health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(social, has state problems)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(social, has state health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(social, has state development)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(social, has state health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(social, has state security)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(social, has state health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(social, has state problems)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(social, has state health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(social, has state security)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(social, has state health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(social, has state security)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(social, has state health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(social, has state problems)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(social, has state health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(social, has state development)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(social, has state health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(social, has state development)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(social, has state health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(social, has state problems)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(social, has state health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(social, has state development)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(social, has state health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(social, has state health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(social, has state health)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(social, has state health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(social, has state health)