social: is security going

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents community
Weight: 0.63
, program
Weight: 0.61
, concept
Weight: 0.59
, company
Weight: 0.58
, aspect
Weight: 0.58
Siblings youth
Weight: 0.33
, culture
Weight: 0.32
, gender
Weight: 0.32
, other people
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
is security going 1.00
has state security 0.88

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(social, is security going) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(social, is security going)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(social, is security going) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(social, has state security)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(social, is security going) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(social, has state security)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(social, is security going) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(social, has state security)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(social, is security going) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(social, has state security)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(social, is security going) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(social, is security going) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(social, is security going)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(social, is security going) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(social, is security going)