society: was more democratic than others

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents institution
Weight: 0.70
, organism
Weight: 0.65
, force
Weight: 0.63
, country
Weight: 0.62
Siblings humanity
Weight: 0.65
, cuba
Weight: 0.61
, argument
Weight: 0.59
, alliance
Weight: 0.59
, roman republic
Weight: 0.59

Related properties

Property Similarity
was more democratic than others 1.00
be unsuitable for direct democracy 0.75
be unsuitable for democracy 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(society, was more democratic than others) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(society, was more democratic than others)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(society, was more democratic than others) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(society, be unsuitable for direct democracy)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(society, was more democratic than others) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(society, be unsuitable for democracy)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(society, was more democratic than others) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(society, be unsuitable for direct democracy)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(society, was more democratic than others) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(society, be unsuitable for democracy)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(society, was more democratic than others) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(society, be unsuitable for direct democracy)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(society, was more democratic than others) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(society, be unsuitable for democracy)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(society, was more democratic than others) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(society, be unsuitable for direct democracy)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(society, was more democratic than others) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(society, be unsuitable for democracy)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(society, was more democratic than others) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(society, was more democratic than others) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(society, was more democratic than others)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(society, was more democratic than others) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(society, was more democratic than others)