sofa: were called davenports

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents sofa bed
Weight: 0.75
, chair
Weight: 0.63
, table
Weight: 0.61
, piece
Weight: 0.58
Siblings chaise lounge
Weight: 0.60
, divan
Weight: 0.45
, couch
Weight: 0.37
, picnic table
Weight: 0.35
, dining table
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
were called davenports 1.00
be called davenports 0.87
be called chesterfields 0.87
were made 0.86

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(chair, were made)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(sofa, were called davenports)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(sofa, were called davenports)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(chair, were made)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(sofa, were called davenports)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(chair, were made)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(sofa, were called davenports)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(couch, be called chesterfields)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(sofa, were called davenports)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(couch, be called davenports)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(chair, were made)
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(sofa, were called davenports)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(sofa, were called davenports)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(sofa, were called davenports)
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(couch, be called chesterfields)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(couch, be called chesterfields)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(sofa, were called davenports)
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(couch, be called davenports)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(couch, be called davenports)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(sofa, were called davenports)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(sofa, were called davenports)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(sofa, were called davenports)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(sofa, be called chesterfields)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(sofa, were called davenports)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(sofa, be called chesterfields)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(sofa, were called davenports)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(sofa, be called chesterfields)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(sofa, were called davenports)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(sofa, be called davenports)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(sofa, were called davenports)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(sofa, be called davenports)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(sofa, were called davenports)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(sofa, be called davenports)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(sofa, were called davenports)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(sofa, be called chesterfields)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(sofa, were called davenports)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(sofa, be called davenports)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(sofa, were called davenports)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(sofa, were called davenports)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(sofa, were called davenports)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(sofa, were called davenports)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(sofa, were called davenports)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(sofa, were called davenports)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(chair, were made)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(sofa, were called davenports)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(couch, be called chesterfields)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(sofa, were called davenports)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(couch, be called davenports)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(sofa, were called davenports)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(chair, were made)