soft drink: is harmful

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents carbonated beverage
Weight: 0.78
, alcoholic beverage
Weight: 0.76
, snack
Weight: 0.71
, liquid
Weight: 0.70
Siblings bottled water
Weight: 0.74
, coca cola
Weight: 0.74
, orange juice
Weight: 0.71
, diet coke
Weight: 0.71
, apple juice
Weight: 0.69

Related properties

Property Similarity
is harmful 1.00
have harm 0.79
is unhealthy 0.79
is corrosive 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, is harmful)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(apple juice, is unhealthy)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, is harmful)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(bottled water, is harmful)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, is harmful)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(diet coke, is harmful)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, is harmful)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(bottled water, is unhealthy)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, is harmful)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(diet coke, is unhealthy)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(soft drink, is harmful)
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(diet coke, is harmful)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(diet coke, is harmful)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(soft drink, is harmful)
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(bottled water, is harmful)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(bottled water, is harmful)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(soft drink, is harmful)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(diet coke, is unhealthy)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(diet coke, is unhealthy)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(soft drink, is harmful)
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(bottled water, is unhealthy)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(bottled water, is unhealthy)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(soft drink, is harmful)
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(apple juice, is unhealthy)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(apple juice, is unhealthy)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(soft drink, is harmful)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(soft drink, is harmful)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(soft drink, is harmful)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(soft drink, is unhealthy)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(soft drink, is harmful)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(soft drink, is unhealthy)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(soft drink, is harmful)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, is unhealthy)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(soft drink, is harmful)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(soft drink, have harm)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(soft drink, is harmful)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(soft drink, is unhealthy)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(soft drink, is harmful)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(soft drink, have harm)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(soft drink, is harmful)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(soft drink, have harm)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(soft drink, is harmful)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, have harm)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(soft drink, is harmful)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(soft drink, is harmful)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, is harmful)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(soft drink, is harmful)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(soft drink, is harmful)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, is harmful)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(diet coke, is harmful)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, is harmful)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(bottled water, is harmful)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, is harmful)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(diet coke, is unhealthy)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, is harmful)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(apple juice, is unhealthy)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, is harmful)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(bottled water, is unhealthy)