software: be developed

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents software company
Weight: 0.74
, computer program
Weight: 0.70
, module
Weight: 0.67
, code
Weight: 0.65
Siblings browser
Weight: 0.75
, computer game
Weight: 0.75
, free software
Weight: 0.74
, freeware
Weight: 0.70
, source code
Weight: 0.69

Related properties

Property Similarity
be developed 1.00
be developed in three stages 0.79
was created 0.76
was invented 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(code, was invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(software, be developed)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(code, was created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(software, be developed)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(software, be developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(code, was created)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(software, be developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(code, was invented)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(software, be developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(code, was invented)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.15
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(software, be developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(code, was created)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(code, was created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(software, be developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(software, be developed)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(code, was invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(software, be developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(software, be developed)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(software, be developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(software, be developed)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(software, be developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(software, be developed in three stages)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(software, be developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(software, be developed in three stages)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(software, be developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(software, was invented)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(software, be developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(software, was invented)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(software, be developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(software, be developed in three stages)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(software, be developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(software, was invented)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(software, be developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(software, was invented)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(software, be developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(software, be developed in three stages)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(software, be developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(software, be developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(software, be developed)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(software, be developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(software, be developed)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(software, be developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(code, was created)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(software, be developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(code, was invented)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(software, be developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(code, was created)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(software, be developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(code, was invented)