sol: be shows bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.51
, brand
Weight: 0.46
, artist
Weight: 0.46
, beer
Weight: 0.45
Siblings cd player
Weight: 0.31
, puerto rican
Weight: 0.30
, cd rom
Weight: 0.30
, el nino
Weight: 0.30
, florence
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
be shows bad 1.00
has quality bad 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(sol, be shows bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(florence, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(sol, be shows bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(el nino, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(sol, be shows bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(florence, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(florence, has quality bad)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(sol, be shows bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(el nino, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(el nino, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(sol, be shows bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(sol, be shows bad)

Similarity expansion

0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(sol, be shows bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(sol, has quality bad)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(sol, be shows bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(sol, has quality bad)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(sol, be shows bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(sol, has quality bad)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(sol, be shows bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(sol, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(sol, be shows bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(sol, be shows bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(sol, be shows bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(sol, be shows bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(sol, be shows bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(sol, be shows bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(florence, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(sol, be shows bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(el nino, has quality bad)