sol: has quality ultimate

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.51
, brand
Weight: 0.46
, artist
Weight: 0.46
, beer
Weight: 0.45
Siblings cd player
Weight: 0.31
, puerto rican
Weight: 0.30
, cd rom
Weight: 0.30
, el nino
Weight: 0.30
, florence
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality ultimate 1.00
has quality good 0.80
has quality bad 0.77
is harkins real 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(beer, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(sol, has quality ultimate)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(brand, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(sol, has quality ultimate)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(sol, has quality ultimate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(brand, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(sol, has quality ultimate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(beer, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.17
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(sol, has quality ultimate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(beer, has quality good)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(sol, has quality ultimate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(brand, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(sol, has quality ultimate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(florence, has quality bad)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(sol, has quality ultimate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(el nino, has quality bad)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(sol, has quality ultimate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(florence, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(beer, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(sol, has quality ultimate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(sol, has quality ultimate)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(brand, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(sol, has quality ultimate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(sol, has quality ultimate)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(sol, has quality ultimate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(florence, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(florence, has quality good)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(sol, has quality ultimate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(florence, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(florence, has quality bad)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(sol, has quality ultimate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(el nino, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(el nino, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(sol, has quality ultimate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(sol, has quality ultimate)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(sol, has quality ultimate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(sol, has quality bad)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(sol, has quality ultimate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(sol, has quality good)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(sol, has quality ultimate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(sol, is harkins real)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(sol, has quality ultimate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(sol, has quality bad)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(sol, has quality ultimate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(sol, has quality good)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(sol, has quality ultimate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(sol, is harkins real)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(sol, has quality ultimate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(sol, is harkins real)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(sol, has quality ultimate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(sol, is harkins real)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(sol, has quality ultimate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(sol, has quality bad)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(sol, has quality ultimate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(sol, has quality good)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(sol, has quality ultimate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(sol, has quality good)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(sol, has quality ultimate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(sol, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(sol, has quality ultimate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(sol, has quality ultimate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(sol, has quality ultimate)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(sol, has quality ultimate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(sol, has quality ultimate)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.13
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(sol, has quality ultimate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(brand, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(sol, has quality ultimate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(beer, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(sol, has quality ultimate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(florence, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(sol, has quality ultimate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(florence, has quality good)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(sol, has quality ultimate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(el nino, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(sol, has quality ultimate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(brand, has quality good)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(sol, has quality ultimate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(beer, has quality good)