solar cell: is costly

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents electronic device
Weight: 0.70
, technology
Weight: 0.66
, electronics
Weight: 0.65
, system
Weight: 0.64
Siblings inverter
Weight: 0.36
, electric motor
Weight: 0.35
, antenna
Weight: 0.35
, diode
Weight: 0.35
, cellular telephone
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
is costly 1.00
is expensive 0.87
is inefficient 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(solar cell, is costly)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(electric motor, is expensive)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(solar cell, is costly)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(inverter, is expensive)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(solar cell, is costly)
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(inverter, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(inverter, is expensive)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(solar cell, is costly)
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(electric motor, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(electric motor, is expensive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(solar cell, is costly)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(solar cell, is costly)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(solar cell, is costly)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(solar cell, is expensive)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(solar cell, is costly)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(solar cell, is expensive)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(solar cell, is costly)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(solar cell, is expensive)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(solar cell, is costly)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(solar cell, is inefficient)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(solar cell, is costly)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(solar cell, is inefficient)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(solar cell, is costly)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(solar cell, is inefficient)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(solar cell, is costly)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(solar cell, is expensive)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(solar cell, is costly)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(solar cell, is inefficient)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(solar cell, is costly)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(solar cell, is costly)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(solar cell, is costly)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(solar cell, is costly)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(solar cell, is costly)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(solar cell, is costly)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(electric motor, is expensive)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(solar cell, is costly)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(inverter, is expensive)