solar energy: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents energy
Weight: 0.88
, resource
Weight: 0.67
, industry
Weight: 0.66
Siblings thermal energy
Weight: 0.38
, kinetic energy
Weight: 0.38
, wind
Weight: 0.37
, natural gas
Weight: 0.35
, light bulb
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
has quality bad 0.96
be good for environment 0.80
be bad for environment 0.77
is best 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(energy, be good for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(solar energy, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(solar energy, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(energy, be good for environment)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(solar energy, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(energy, be good for environment)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(solar energy, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(light bulb, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(solar energy, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(natural gas, be bad for environment)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(solar energy, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(light bulb, be bad for environment)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(energy, be good for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(solar energy, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(solar energy, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(solar energy, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(light bulb, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(light bulb, has quality bad)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(solar energy, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(natural gas, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(natural gas, be bad for environment)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(solar energy, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(light bulb, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(light bulb, be bad for environment)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(solar energy, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(solar energy, has quality good)

Similarity expansion

0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(solar energy, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(solar energy, has quality bad)
0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(solar energy, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(solar energy, has quality bad)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(solar energy, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(solar energy, has quality bad)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(solar energy, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(solar energy, has quality bad)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(solar energy, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(solar energy, be good for environment)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(solar energy, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(solar energy, be bad for environment)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(solar energy, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(solar energy, be good for environment)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(solar energy, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(solar energy, be bad for environment)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(solar energy, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(solar energy, be bad for environment)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(solar energy, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(solar energy, is best)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(solar energy, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(solar energy, be bad for environment)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(solar energy, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(solar energy, be good for environment)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(solar energy, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(solar energy, is best)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(solar energy, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(solar energy, is best)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(solar energy, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(solar energy, be good for environment)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(solar energy, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(solar energy, is best)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(solar energy, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(solar energy, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(solar energy, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(solar energy, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(solar energy, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(solar energy, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(energy, be good for environment)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(solar energy, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(light bulb, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(solar energy, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(natural gas, be bad for environment)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(solar energy, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(light bulb, be bad for environment)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(solar energy, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(energy, be good for environment)