soldier: man position

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents public servant
Weight: 0.68
, enemy
Weight: 0.64
, police officer
Weight: 0.63
, officer
Weight: 0.62
Siblings man
Weight: 0.68
, driver
Weight: 0.64
, medic
Weight: 0.61
, sergeant
Weight: 0.58
, gunner
Weight: 0.57

Related properties

Property Similarity
man position 1.00
man his post 0.81
own another man 0.79
object to another man 0.78
subject himself to woman 0.78
be used to woman 0.77
desire that man love him 0.77
man station 0.77
battle another man 0.76
need woman 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(soldier, man position) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(gunner, man position)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(soldier, man position) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(man, need woman)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(soldier, man position) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(gunner, man position) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(gunner, man position)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(soldier, man position) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(man, need woman) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(man, need woman)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(soldier, man position) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(soldier, man position)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(soldier, man position) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(soldier, man position) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(soldier, man position)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(soldier, man position) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(soldier, man position)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(soldier, man position) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(gunner, man position)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(soldier, man position) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(man, need woman)