soldier: wear hats instead of helmets

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents enemy
Weight: 0.64
, police officer
Weight: 0.63
, officer
Weight: 0.62
Siblings man
Weight: 0.68
, driver
Weight: 0.64
, medic
Weight: 0.61
, special force
Weight: 0.60
, command
Weight: 0.58

Related properties

Property Similarity
wear hats instead of helmets 1.00
wear helmets 0.96
wear hats 0.94
use helmets 0.92
wear nets on helmets 0.91
sit on helmets 0.90
wear funny hats 0.88
wear uniforms 0.88
wear shirts 0.87
take off hats 0.87

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(police officer, wear hats)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(soldier, wear hats instead of helmets)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(police officer, wear uniforms)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(soldier, wear hats instead of helmets)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(soldier, wear hats instead of helmets)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(police officer, wear hats)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(soldier, wear hats instead of helmets)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(police officer, wear uniforms)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(soldier, wear hats instead of helmets)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(police officer, wear hats)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(soldier, wear hats instead of helmets)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(police officer, wear uniforms)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(soldier, wear hats instead of helmets)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(special force, wear helmets)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(soldier, wear hats instead of helmets)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(special force, wear hats)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(police officer, wear hats)
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(soldier, wear hats instead of helmets)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(soldier, wear hats instead of helmets)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(police officer, wear uniforms)
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(soldier, wear hats instead of helmets)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(soldier, wear hats instead of helmets)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(soldier, wear hats instead of helmets)
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(special force, wear helmets)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(special force, wear helmets)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(soldier, wear hats instead of helmets)
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(special force, wear hats)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(special force, wear hats)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(soldier, wear hats instead of helmets)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(soldier, wear hats instead of helmets)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(soldier, wear hats instead of helmets)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(soldier, wear uniforms)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(soldier, wear hats instead of helmets)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(soldier, wear uniforms)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(soldier, wear hats instead of helmets)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(soldier, wear uniforms)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(soldier, wear hats instead of helmets)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(soldier, wear uniforms)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(soldier, wear hats instead of helmets)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(soldier, wear hats instead of helmets)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(soldier, wear hats instead of helmets)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(soldier, wear hats instead of helmets)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(soldier, wear hats instead of helmets)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(soldier, wear hats instead of helmets)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(police officer, wear hats)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(soldier, wear hats instead of helmets)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(police officer, wear uniforms)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(soldier, wear hats instead of helmets)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(special force, wear hats)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(soldier, wear hats instead of helmets)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(special force, wear helmets)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(soldier, wear hats instead of helmets)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(police officer, wear hats)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(soldier, wear hats instead of helmets)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(police officer, wear uniforms)