solicitor: ask for bank statements

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents agent
Weight: 0.63
, person
Weight: 0.62
, lawyer
Weight: 0.58
, third party
Weight: 0.55
Siblings barrister
Weight: 0.63
, attorney
Weight: 0.35
, landlord
Weight: 0.34
, accountant
Weight: 0.34
, defendant
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
ask for bank statements 1.00
need bank statements 0.96

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(agent, ask for bank statements)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(solicitor, ask for bank statements)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(solicitor, ask for bank statements)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(agent, ask for bank statements)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(solicitor, ask for bank statements)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(agent, ask for bank statements)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(solicitor, ask for bank statements)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(accountant, need bank statements)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(solicitor, ask for bank statements)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(landlord, ask for bank statements)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(solicitor, ask for bank statements)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(landlord, need bank statements)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(agent, ask for bank statements)
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(solicitor, ask for bank statements)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(solicitor, ask for bank statements)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(solicitor, ask for bank statements)
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(landlord, ask for bank statements)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(landlord, ask for bank statements)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(solicitor, ask for bank statements)
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(landlord, need bank statements)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(landlord, need bank statements)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(solicitor, ask for bank statements)
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(accountant, need bank statements)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(accountant, need bank statements)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(solicitor, ask for bank statements)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(solicitor, ask for bank statements)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(solicitor, ask for bank statements)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(solicitor, need bank statements)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(solicitor, ask for bank statements)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(solicitor, need bank statements)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(solicitor, ask for bank statements)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(solicitor, need bank statements)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(solicitor, ask for bank statements)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(solicitor, need bank statements)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(solicitor, ask for bank statements)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(solicitor, ask for bank statements)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(solicitor, ask for bank statements)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(solicitor, ask for bank statements)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(solicitor, ask for bank statements)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(solicitor, ask for bank statements)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(agent, ask for bank statements)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(solicitor, ask for bank statements)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(landlord, need bank statements)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(solicitor, ask for bank statements)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(landlord, ask for bank statements)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(solicitor, ask for bank statements)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(accountant, need bank statements)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(solicitor, ask for bank statements)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(agent, ask for bank statements)