solicitor: be called briefs

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents agent
Weight: 0.63
, person
Weight: 0.62
, lawyer
Weight: 0.58
, third party
Weight: 0.55
Siblings barrister
Weight: 0.63
, attorney
Weight: 0.35
, landlord
Weight: 0.34
, accountant
Weight: 0.34
, defendant
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be called briefs 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(solicitor, be called briefs)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(barrister, be called briefs)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(solicitor, be called briefs)
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(barrister, be called briefs)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(barrister, be called briefs)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(solicitor, be called briefs)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(solicitor, be called briefs)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(solicitor, be called briefs)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(solicitor, be called briefs)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(solicitor, be called briefs)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(solicitor, be called briefs)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(solicitor, be called briefs)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(solicitor, be called briefs)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(barrister, be called briefs)