solicitor: have high fees

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents agent
Weight: 0.63
, person
Weight: 0.62
, lawyer
Weight: 0.58
, third party
Weight: 0.55
Siblings barrister
Weight: 0.63
, attorney
Weight: 0.35
, landlord
Weight: 0.34
, accountant
Weight: 0.34
, defendant
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
have high fees 1.00
have fees 0.96
is fees 0.95

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(solicitor, have high fees) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(attorney, is fees)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(solicitor, have high fees) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(attorney, is fees) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(attorney, is fees)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(solicitor, have high fees) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(solicitor, have high fees)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(solicitor, have high fees) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(solicitor, is fees)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(solicitor, have high fees) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(solicitor, is fees)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(solicitor, have high fees) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(solicitor, is fees)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(solicitor, have high fees) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(solicitor, have fees)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(solicitor, have high fees) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(solicitor, have fees)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(solicitor, have high fees) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(solicitor, have fees)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(solicitor, have high fees) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(solicitor, have fees)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(solicitor, have high fees) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(solicitor, is fees)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(solicitor, have high fees) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(solicitor, have high fees) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(solicitor, have high fees)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(solicitor, have high fees) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(solicitor, have high fees)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(solicitor, have high fees) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(attorney, is fees)