solicitor: need barristers

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents agent
Weight: 0.63
, person
Weight: 0.62
, lawyer
Weight: 0.58
, third party
Weight: 0.55
Siblings barrister
Weight: 0.63
, attorney
Weight: 0.35
, landlord
Weight: 0.34
, accountant
Weight: 0.34
, defendant
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
need barristers 1.00
sit behind barristers 0.94
instruct barristers 0.92
be called solicitors 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(solicitor, need barristers)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(solicitor, need barristers)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(solicitor, need barristers)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(solicitor, sit behind barristers)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(solicitor, need barristers)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(solicitor, instruct barristers)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(solicitor, need barristers)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(solicitor, sit behind barristers)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(solicitor, need barristers)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(solicitor, be called solicitors)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(solicitor, need barristers)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(solicitor, instruct barristers)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(solicitor, need barristers)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(solicitor, be called solicitors)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(solicitor, need barristers)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(solicitor, sit behind barristers)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(solicitor, need barristers)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(solicitor, sit behind barristers)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(solicitor, need barristers)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(solicitor, instruct barristers)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(solicitor, need barristers)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(solicitor, instruct barristers)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(solicitor, need barristers)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(solicitor, be called solicitors)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(solicitor, need barristers)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(solicitor, be called solicitors)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(solicitor, need barristers)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(solicitor, need barristers)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(solicitor, need barristers)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(solicitor, need barristers)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(solicitor, need barristers)