solidarity: has quality service

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents value
Weight: 0.60
, principle
Weight: 0.59
, movement
Weight: 0.57
, concept
Weight: 0.56
, theme
Weight: 0.55
Siblings compassion
Weight: 0.34
, unity
Weight: 0.34
, faith
Weight: 0.33
, patriotism
Weight: 0.33
, fairness
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality service 1.00
is quality 0.84
has quality good 0.81
has quality better 0.80
is important quality 0.80
has quality bad 0.79
be important to customer 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(theme, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(solidarity, has quality service)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(movement, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(solidarity, has quality service)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(value, be important to customer)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(solidarity, has quality service)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(solidarity, has quality service)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(theme, has quality better)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(solidarity, has quality service)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(movement, has quality bad)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(solidarity, has quality service)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(value, be important to customer)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(solidarity, has quality service)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(value, be important to customer)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(solidarity, has quality service)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(movement, has quality bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(solidarity, has quality service)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(theme, has quality better)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(solidarity, has quality service)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(unity, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(solidarity, has quality service)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(compassion, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(solidarity, has quality service)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(faith, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(solidarity, has quality service)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(patriotism, has quality bad)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(solidarity, has quality service)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(patriotism, has quality good)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(solidarity, has quality service)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(faith, is important quality)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(solidarity, has quality service)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(faith, has quality good)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(solidarity, has quality service)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(compassion, has quality good)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.15
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(solidarity, has quality service)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(unity, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(theme, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(solidarity, has quality service)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(solidarity, has quality service)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(movement, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(solidarity, has quality service)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(solidarity, has quality service)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(value, be important to customer)
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(solidarity, has quality service)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(solidarity, has quality service)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(solidarity, has quality service)
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(unity, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(unity, has quality good)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(solidarity, has quality service)
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(compassion, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(compassion, has quality good)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(solidarity, has quality service)
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(unity, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(unity, has quality bad)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(solidarity, has quality service)
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(compassion, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(compassion, has quality bad)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(solidarity, has quality service)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(patriotism, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(patriotism, has quality good)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(solidarity, has quality service)
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(faith, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(faith, has quality good)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(solidarity, has quality service)
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(patriotism, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(patriotism, has quality bad)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(solidarity, has quality service)
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(faith, is important quality)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(faith, is important quality)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(solidarity, has quality service)
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(faith, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(faith, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(solidarity, has quality service)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(solidarity, has quality service)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(solidarity, has quality service)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(solidarity, has quality service)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(solidarity, has quality service)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(solidarity, has quality service)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(solidarity, has quality service)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(solidarity, has quality service)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(theme, has quality better)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(solidarity, has quality service)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(movement, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.12
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(solidarity, has quality service)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(value, be important to customer)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(solidarity, has quality service)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(unity, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(solidarity, has quality service)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(compassion, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(solidarity, has quality service)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(unity, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(solidarity, has quality service)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(compassion, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(solidarity, has quality service)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(patriotism, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(solidarity, has quality service)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(patriotism, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(solidarity, has quality service)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(faith, has quality bad)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(solidarity, has quality service)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(faith, has quality good)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(solidarity, has quality service)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(faith, is important quality)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.17
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(solidarity, has quality service)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(theme, has quality better)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(solidarity, has quality service)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(movement, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.13
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(solidarity, has quality service)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(value, be important to customer)