solidarity: is surcharge

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents value
Weight: 0.60
, principle
Weight: 0.59
, movement
Weight: 0.57
, concept
Weight: 0.56
, theme
Weight: 0.55
Siblings compassion
Weight: 0.34
, unity
Weight: 0.34
, faith
Weight: 0.33
, patriotism
Weight: 0.33
, fairness
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
is surcharge 1.00
be added tax levied 0.80
is tax 0.77
be added tax regressive 0.76
be added tax 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(value, be added tax regressive)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(solidarity, is surcharge)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(solidarity, is surcharge)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(value, be added tax regressive)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(solidarity, is surcharge)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(value, be added tax regressive)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.20
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(value, be added tax regressive)
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(solidarity, is surcharge)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(solidarity, is surcharge)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(solidarity, is surcharge)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(solidarity, is surcharge)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(solidarity, is surcharge)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(solidarity, is tax)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(solidarity, is surcharge)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(solidarity, is tax)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(solidarity, is surcharge)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(solidarity, is tax)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(solidarity, is surcharge)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(solidarity, is tax)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(solidarity, is surcharge)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(solidarity, is surcharge)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(solidarity, is surcharge)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(solidarity, is surcharge)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(solidarity, is surcharge)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(solidarity, is surcharge)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(value, be added tax regressive)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(solidarity, is surcharge)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(value, be added tax regressive)