solo: get bad reviews

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents album
Weight: 0.53
, setting
Weight: 0.52
, duet
Weight: 0.51
, event
Weight: 0.51
Siblings guitar
Weight: 0.32
, recital
Weight: 0.30
, tour
Weight: 0.30
, concert
Weight: 0.30
, exhibition
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
get bad reviews 1.00
get reviews 0.97
is reviews 0.94
is review 0.78
do bad 0.78
has quality bad 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(solo, get bad reviews)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(concert, is reviews)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(solo, get bad reviews)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(concert, is review)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(solo, get bad reviews)
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(concert, is reviews)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(concert, is reviews)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(solo, get bad reviews)
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(concert, is review)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(concert, is review)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(solo, get bad reviews)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(solo, get bad reviews)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(solo, get bad reviews)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(solo, do bad)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(solo, get bad reviews)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(solo, do bad)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(solo, get bad reviews)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(solo, do bad)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(solo, get bad reviews)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(solo, has quality bad)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(solo, get bad reviews)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(solo, has quality bad)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(solo, get bad reviews)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(solo, has quality bad)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(solo, get bad reviews)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(solo, do bad)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(solo, get bad reviews)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(solo, has quality bad)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(solo, get bad reviews)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(solo, get reviews)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(solo, get bad reviews)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(solo, get reviews)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(solo, get bad reviews)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(solo, get reviews)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(solo, get bad reviews)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(solo, get reviews)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(solo, get bad reviews)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(solo, get bad reviews)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(solo, get bad reviews)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(solo, get bad reviews)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(solo, get bad reviews)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(solo, get bad reviews)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(concert, is reviews)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(solo, get bad reviews)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(concert, is review)