solution: be considered as life supporting

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents option
Weight: 0.71
, software
Weight: 0.62
, structure
Weight: 0.61
, recommendation
Weight: 0.60
Siblings operating system
Weight: 0.70
, configuration
Weight: 0.65
, model
Weight: 0.64
, technology
Weight: 0.64
, agreement
Weight: 0.64

Related properties

Property Similarity
be considered as life supporting 1.00
be important to life 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(structure, be important to life) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(solution, be considered as life supporting)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(solution, be considered as life supporting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(structure, be important to life)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(solution, be considered as life supporting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(structure, be important to life)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(structure, be important to life) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(solution, be considered as life supporting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(solution, be considered as life supporting)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(solution, be considered as life supporting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(solution, be considered as life supporting)

Similarity expansion

0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(solution, be considered as life supporting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(solution, be important to life)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(solution, be considered as life supporting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(solution, be important to life)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(solution, be considered as life supporting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(solution, be important to life)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(solution, be considered as life supporting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(solution, be important to life)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(solution, be considered as life supporting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(solution, be considered as life supporting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(solution, be considered as life supporting)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(solution, be considered as life supporting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(solution, be considered as life supporting)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.10
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(solution, be considered as life supporting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(structure, be important to life)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(solution, be considered as life supporting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(structure, be important to life)