solution: have depressed freezing point

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents option
Weight: 0.71
, software
Weight: 0.62
, structure
Weight: 0.61
, recommendation
Weight: 0.60
Siblings operating system
Weight: 0.70
, configuration
Weight: 0.65
, model
Weight: 0.64
, technology
Weight: 0.64
, agreement
Weight: 0.64

Related properties

Property Similarity
have depressed freezing point 1.00
have lower freezing points 0.85
freeze at lower temperatures 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(solution, have depressed freezing point) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(solution, have depressed freezing point)

Similarity expansion

0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(solution, have depressed freezing point) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(solution, have lower freezing points)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(solution, have depressed freezing point) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(solution, have lower freezing points)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(solution, have depressed freezing point) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(solution, have lower freezing points)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(solution, have depressed freezing point) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(solution, have lower freezing points)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(solution, have depressed freezing point) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(solution, freeze at lower temperatures)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(solution, have depressed freezing point) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(solution, freeze at lower temperatures)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(solution, have depressed freezing point) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(solution, freeze at lower temperatures)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(solution, have depressed freezing point) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(solution, freeze at lower temperatures)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(solution, have depressed freezing point) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(solution, have depressed freezing point) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(solution, have depressed freezing point)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(solution, have depressed freezing point) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(solution, have depressed freezing point)