solution: have different molarities

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents option
Weight: 0.71
, software
Weight: 0.62
, structure
Weight: 0.61
, recommendation
Weight: 0.60
Siblings operating system
Weight: 0.70
, configuration
Weight: 0.65
, model
Weight: 0.64
, technology
Weight: 0.64
, agreement
Weight: 0.64

Related properties

Property Similarity
have different molarities 1.00
be different 0.97
be different from suspentions 0.93
differ from other types of matter 0.83
differ from other types 0.82
differ from types of matter 0.81
differ from types 0.80
be different from other mixtures 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(structure, be different)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(solution, have different molarities)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(software, be different)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(solution, have different molarities)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(solution, have different molarities)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(software, be different)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(solution, have different molarities)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(structure, be different)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(solution, have different molarities)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(software, be different)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(solution, have different molarities)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(structure, be different)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(solution, have different molarities)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(model, be different)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(structure, be different)
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(solution, have different molarities)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(solution, have different molarities)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(software, be different)
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(solution, have different molarities)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(solution, have different molarities)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(solution, have different molarities)
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(model, be different)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(model, be different)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(solution, have different molarities)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(solution, have different molarities)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(solution, have different molarities)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(solution, be different from suspentions)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(solution, have different molarities)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(solution, be different from suspentions)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(solution, have different molarities)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(solution, be different from suspentions)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(solution, have different molarities)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(solution, differ from other types of matter)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(solution, have different molarities)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(solution, be different from suspentions)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(solution, have different molarities)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(solution, be different)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(solution, have different molarities)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(solution, be different)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(solution, have different molarities)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(solution, be different)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(solution, have different molarities)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(solution, differ from other types of matter)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(solution, have different molarities)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(solution, be different)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(solution, have different molarities)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(solution, be different from other mixtures)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(solution, have different molarities)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(solution, differ from other types of matter)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(solution, have different molarities)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(solution, be different from other mixtures)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(solution, have different molarities)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(solution, be different from other mixtures)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(solution, have different molarities)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(solution, be different from other mixtures)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(solution, have different molarities)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(solution, differ from other types of matter)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(solution, have different molarities)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(solution, have different molarities)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(solution, have different molarities)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(solution, have different molarities)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(solution, have different molarities)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(solution, have different molarities)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(structure, be different)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(solution, have different molarities)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(software, be different)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(solution, have different molarities)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(model, be different)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(solution, have different molarities)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(structure, be different)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(solution, have different molarities)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(software, be different)