:
from
Related concepts
Related properties
Priors about this statement
Cues
|
Evidence
|
Clauses
Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(soma, is like)
⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(paxil, is like)
Remarkability from sibling implausibility
0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(soma, is like)
⋁
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(paxil, is like)
⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(paxil, is like)
Salient implies Plausible
0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(soma, is like)
⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(soma, is like)
Similarity expansion
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(soma, is like)
⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(soma, is most like)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(soma, is like)
⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(soma, is most like)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(soma, is like)
⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(soma, is most like)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(soma, is like)
⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(soma, is most like)
Typical and Remarkable implies Salient
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(soma, is like)
⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(soma, is like)
⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(soma, is like)
Typical implies Plausible
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(soma, is like)
⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(soma, is like)
Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(soma, is like)
⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(paxil, is like)