son: be at park

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents father
Weight: 0.72
, young man
Weight: 0.71
, toddler
Weight: 0.68
, daughter
Weight: 0.68
Siblings henry
Weight: 0.58
, pulpit
Weight: 0.51
, mother
Weight: 0.40
, husband
Weight: 0.39
, old man
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at park 1.00
be at in park 0.99

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(son, be at park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(mother, be at in park)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(son, be at park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(mother, be at in park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(mother, be at in park)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(son, be at park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(son, be at park)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(son, be at park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(son, be at park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(son, be at park)

Typical implies Plausible

0.09
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(son, be at park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(son, be at park)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(son, be at park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(mother, be at in park)