son: be in law written

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents father
Weight: 0.72
, young man
Weight: 0.71
, toddler
Weight: 0.68
, daughter
Weight: 0.68
Siblings henry
Weight: 0.58
, pulpit
Weight: 0.51
, mother
Weight: 0.40
, husband
Weight: 0.39
, old man
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in law written 1.00
be in law 0.90

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(daughter, be in law) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(son, be in law written)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(son, be in law written) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(daughter, be in law)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.51
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(son, be in law written) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(daughter, be in law)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(son, be in law written) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(mother, be in law)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(daughter, be in law) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(son, be in law written) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(son, be in law written)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(son, be in law written) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(mother, be in law) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(mother, be in law)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(son, be in law written) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(son, be in law written)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(son, be in law written) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(son, be in law written) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(son, be in law written)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(son, be in law written) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(son, be in law written)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(son, be in law written) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(daughter, be in law)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(son, be in law written) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(mother, be in law)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(son, be in law written) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(daughter, be in law)