sonar: be used for location

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents device
Weight: 0.62
, equipment
Weight: 0.59
, method
Weight: 0.57
, tool
Weight: 0.56
, field
Weight: 0.55
Siblings smoke detector
Weight: 0.34
, galvanometer
Weight: 0.33
, ultrasound
Weight: 0.33
, electronic device
Weight: 0.33
, cooling device
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be used for location 1.00
is used for 0.80
be used 0.77
is is used 0.77
be located in network 0.76
is located 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.34
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(field, be used) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(sonar, be used for location)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(tool, is used for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(sonar, be used for location)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(device, be located in network) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(sonar, be used for location)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(tool, is located) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(sonar, be used for location)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(tool, is is used) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(sonar, be used for location)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(sonar, be used for location) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(tool, is used for)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(sonar, be used for location) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(tool, is is used)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(sonar, be used for location) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(tool, is located)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(sonar, be used for location) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(device, be located in network)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(sonar, be used for location) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(field, be used)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(sonar, be used for location) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(device, be located in network)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(sonar, be used for location) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(field, be used)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(sonar, be used for location) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(tool, is used for)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(sonar, be used for location) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(tool, is located)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(sonar, be used for location) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(tool, is is used)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(sonar, be used for location) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(ultrasound, is used for)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(sonar, be used for location) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(galvanometer, is used for)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(sonar, be used for location) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(ultrasound, be used)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(tool, is used for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(sonar, be used for location) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(sonar, be used for location)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(field, be used) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(sonar, be used for location) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(sonar, be used for location)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(device, be located in network) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(sonar, be used for location) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(sonar, be used for location)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(tool, is is used) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(sonar, be used for location) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(sonar, be used for location)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(tool, is located) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(sonar, be used for location) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(sonar, be used for location)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(sonar, be used for location) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(ultrasound, is used for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(ultrasound, is used for)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(sonar, be used for location) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(galvanometer, is used for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(galvanometer, is used for)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(sonar, be used for location) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(ultrasound, be used) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(ultrasound, be used)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(sonar, be used for location) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(sonar, be used for location)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(sonar, be used for location) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(sonar, is used for)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(sonar, be used for location) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(sonar, is used for)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(sonar, be used for location) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(sonar, is used for)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(sonar, be used for location) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(sonar, is used for)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(sonar, be used for location) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(sonar, be used for location) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(sonar, be used for location)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(sonar, be used for location) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(sonar, be used for location)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(sonar, be used for location) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(tool, is used for)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(sonar, be used for location) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(tool, is is used)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(sonar, be used for location) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(tool, is located)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(sonar, be used for location) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(field, be used)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(sonar, be used for location) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(device, be located in network)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(sonar, be used for location) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(ultrasound, be used)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(sonar, be used for location) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(ultrasound, is used for)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(sonar, be used for location) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(galvanometer, is used for)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(sonar, be used for location) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(tool, is used for)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(sonar, be used for location) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(tool, is is used)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(sonar, be used for location) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(tool, is located)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(sonar, be used for location) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(field, be used)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(sonar, be used for location) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(device, be located in network)