sonar: fish bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents device
Weight: 0.62
, equipment
Weight: 0.59
, method
Weight: 0.57
, tool
Weight: 0.56
, field
Weight: 0.55
Siblings smoke detector
Weight: 0.34
, galvanometer
Weight: 0.33
, ultrasound
Weight: 0.33
, electronic device
Weight: 0.33
, cooling device
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
fish bad 1.00
kill whales 0.76
be put on whales 0.75
be useful for dolphins 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.25
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(device, be put on whales) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(sonar, fish bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(sonar, fish bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(device, be put on whales)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(sonar, fish bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(device, be put on whales)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.24
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(device, be put on whales) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(sonar, fish bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(sonar, fish bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(sonar, fish bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(sonar, fish bad)

Similarity expansion

0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(sonar, fish bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(sonar, kill whales)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(sonar, fish bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(sonar, be useful for dolphins)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(sonar, fish bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(sonar, kill whales)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(sonar, fish bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(sonar, be useful for dolphins)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(sonar, fish bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(sonar, kill whales)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(sonar, fish bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(sonar, be useful for dolphins)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(sonar, fish bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(sonar, be useful for dolphins)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(sonar, fish bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(sonar, kill whales)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(sonar, fish bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(sonar, fish bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(sonar, fish bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(sonar, fish bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(sonar, fish bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(sonar, fish bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(device, be put on whales)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(sonar, fish bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(device, be put on whales)