sonar: is dangerous

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents device
Weight: 0.62
, equipment
Weight: 0.59
, method
Weight: 0.57
, tool
Weight: 0.56
, field
Weight: 0.55
Siblings smoke detector
Weight: 0.34
, galvanometer
Weight: 0.33
, ultrasound
Weight: 0.33
, electronic device
Weight: 0.33
, cooling device
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
is dangerous 1.00
act dangerous 0.88
be less dangerous than x-rays 0.85
is harmful 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.33
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(method, act dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(sonar, is dangerous)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(sonar, is dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(method, act dangerous)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(sonar, is dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(method, act dangerous)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(sonar, is dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(ultrasound, be less dangerous than x-rays)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(sonar, is dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(ultrasound, is dangerous)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(sonar, is dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(ultrasound, is harmful)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(method, act dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(sonar, is dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(sonar, is dangerous)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(sonar, is dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(ultrasound, is dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(ultrasound, is dangerous)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(sonar, is dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(ultrasound, be less dangerous than x-rays) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(ultrasound, be less dangerous than x-rays)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(sonar, is dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(ultrasound, is harmful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(ultrasound, is harmful)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(sonar, is dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(sonar, is dangerous)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(sonar, is dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(sonar, is dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(sonar, is dangerous)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(sonar, is dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(sonar, is dangerous)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(sonar, is dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(method, act dangerous)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(sonar, is dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(ultrasound, be less dangerous than x-rays)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(sonar, is dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(ultrasound, is dangerous)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(sonar, is dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(ultrasound, is harmful)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(sonar, is dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(method, act dangerous)