sonar: is method

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents device
Weight: 0.62
, equipment
Weight: 0.59
, method
Weight: 0.57
, tool
Weight: 0.56
, field
Weight: 0.55
Siblings smoke detector
Weight: 0.34
, galvanometer
Weight: 0.33
, ultrasound
Weight: 0.33
, electronic device
Weight: 0.33
, cooling device
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
is method 1.00
differ from method 0.86
be called tool 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(method, differ from method)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(sonar, is method)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(tool, be called tool)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(sonar, is method)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(sonar, is method)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(method, differ from method)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(sonar, is method)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(tool, be called tool)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.13
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(sonar, is method)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(method, differ from method)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.09
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(sonar, is method)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(tool, be called tool)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(method, differ from method)
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(sonar, is method)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(sonar, is method)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(tool, be called tool)
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(sonar, is method)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(sonar, is method)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(sonar, is method)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(sonar, is method)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(sonar, is method)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(sonar, is method)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(sonar, is method)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(sonar, is method)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(sonar, is method)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(sonar, is method)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(method, differ from method)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(sonar, is method)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(tool, be called tool)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(sonar, is method)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(method, differ from method)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(sonar, is method)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(tool, be called tool)