sonar: is valuable safety measure

Related concepts

Parents	device Weight: 0.62 , equipment Weight: 0.59 , method Weight: 0.57 , tool Weight: 0.56 , field Weight: 0.55
Siblings	smoke detector Weight: 0.34 , galvanometer Weight: 0.33 , ultrasound Weight: 0.33 , electronic device Weight: 0.33 , cooling device Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property	Similarity
is valuable safety measure	1.00
is safety measure	0.94
is valuable	0.80
be less effective than design-in safety precautions	0.80
be less effective than safety precautions	0.80
measure current	0.78
measure depth	0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.36

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.64

Plausible(device, be less effective than design-in safety precautions) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Typical(sonar, is valuable safety measure)

0.28

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.47

Plausible(device, be less effective than safety precautions) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Typical(sonar, is valuable safety measure)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.90

Plausible(sonar, is valuable safety measure) ⋁

Evidence: 0.47

¬ Plausible(device, be less effective than safety precautions)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.90

Plausible(sonar, is valuable safety measure) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Plausible(device, be less effective than design-in safety precautions)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.23

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Remarkable(sonar, is valuable safety measure) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Remarkable(device, be less effective than design-in safety precautions)

0.22

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Remarkable(sonar, is valuable safety measure) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Remarkable(device, be less effective than safety precautions)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Remarkable(sonar, is valuable safety measure) ⋁

Evidence: 0.38

¬ Remarkable(ultrasound, measure depth)

0.04

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Remarkable(sonar, is valuable safety measure) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Remarkable(galvanometer, measure current)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.64

Plausible(device, be less effective than design-in safety precautions) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

Remarkable(sonar, is valuable safety measure) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Plausible(sonar, is valuable safety measure)

0.29

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.47

Plausible(device, be less effective than safety precautions) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

Remarkable(sonar, is valuable safety measure) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Plausible(sonar, is valuable safety measure)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.90

Plausible(sonar, is valuable safety measure) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

Remarkable(galvanometer, measure current) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Plausible(galvanometer, measure current)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.90

Plausible(sonar, is valuable safety measure) ⋁

Evidence: 0.38

Remarkable(ultrasound, measure depth) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Plausible(ultrasound, measure depth)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.90

Plausible(sonar, is valuable safety measure) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Salient(sonar, is valuable safety measure)

Similarity expansion

0.78

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.97

Salient(sonar, is valuable safety measure) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Salient(sonar, is safety measure)

0.78

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.90

Typical(sonar, is valuable safety measure) ⋁

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Typical(sonar, is safety measure)

0.76

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.90

Plausible(sonar, is valuable safety measure) ⋁

Evidence: 0.47

¬ Plausible(sonar, is safety measure)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.97

Salient(sonar, is valuable safety measure) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Salient(sonar, is valuable)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.90

Plausible(sonar, is valuable safety measure) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Plausible(sonar, is valuable)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.90

Typical(sonar, is valuable safety measure) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Typical(sonar, is valuable)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.74

Remarkable(sonar, is valuable safety measure) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Remarkable(sonar, is safety measure)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.74

Remarkable(sonar, is valuable safety measure) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Remarkable(sonar, is valuable)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.97

Salient(sonar, is valuable safety measure) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Typical(sonar, is valuable safety measure) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Remarkable(sonar, is valuable safety measure)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.90

Plausible(sonar, is valuable safety measure) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Typical(sonar, is valuable safety measure)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.28

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Remarkable(sonar, is valuable safety measure) ⋁

Evidence: 0.43

¬ Typical(device, be less effective than safety precautions)

0.21

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Remarkable(sonar, is valuable safety measure) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Typical(device, be less effective than design-in safety precautions)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Remarkable(sonar, is valuable safety measure) ⋁

Evidence: 0.46

¬ Typical(galvanometer, measure current)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Remarkable(sonar, is valuable safety measure) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Typical(ultrasound, measure depth)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.90

Typical(sonar, is valuable safety measure) ⋁

Evidence: 0.43

¬ Typical(device, be less effective than safety precautions)

0.36

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.90

Typical(sonar, is valuable safety measure) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Typical(device, be less effective than design-in safety precautions)