songbird: sing

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents species
Weight: 0.63
, variety
Weight: 0.52
, wild animal
Weight: 0.52
, character
Weight: 0.49
, animal
Weight: 0.46
Siblings zebra finch
Weight: 0.69
, robin
Weight: 0.68
, sparrow
Weight: 0.57

Related properties

Property Similarity
sing 1.00
sing at night 0.93
sing intensely at dawn 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(songbird, sing)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(robin, sing)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(songbird, sing)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(sparrow, sing)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(songbird, sing)
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(robin, sing)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(robin, sing)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(songbird, sing)
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(sparrow, sing)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(sparrow, sing)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(songbird, sing)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(songbird, sing)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(songbird, sing)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(songbird, sing at night)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(songbird, sing)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(songbird, sing at night)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(songbird, sing)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(songbird, sing at night)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(songbird, sing)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(songbird, sing at night)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(songbird, sing)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(songbird, sing intensely at dawn)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(songbird, sing)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(songbird, sing intensely at dawn)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(songbird, sing)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(songbird, sing intensely at dawn)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(songbird, sing)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(songbird, sing intensely at dawn)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(songbird, sing)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(songbird, sing)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(songbird, sing)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(songbird, sing)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(songbird, sing)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(songbird, sing)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(robin, sing)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(songbird, sing)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(sparrow, sing)