source: be more secure for development

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents light source
Weight: 0.82
, factor
Weight: 0.66
, witness
Weight: 0.63
, publication
Weight: 0.61
, object
Weight: 0.61
Siblings cause
Weight: 0.62
, galaxy
Weight: 0.58
, pollution
Weight: 0.58
, periodical
Weight: 0.56

Related properties

Property Similarity
be more secure for development 1.00
is more secure 0.93
be more secure 0.93
be considered more secure 0.92
is secure 0.91
be secure 0.91
be considered secure 0.89

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(source, be more secure for development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(source, be more secure for development)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(source, be more secure for development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(source, is more secure)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(source, be more secure for development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(source, be considered more secure)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(source, be more secure for development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(source, be more secure)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(source, be more secure for development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(source, be more secure)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(source, be more secure for development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(source, is more secure)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(source, be more secure for development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(source, be secure)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(source, be more secure for development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(source, be secure)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(source, be more secure for development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(source, be secure)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(source, be more secure for development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(source, be secure)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(source, be more secure for development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(source, be considered more secure)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(source, be more secure for development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(source, is more secure)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(source, be more secure for development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(source, be more secure)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(source, be more secure for development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(source, be considered more secure)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(source, be more secure for development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(source, be secure)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(source, be more secure for development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(source, be secure)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(source, be more secure for development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(source, be secure)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(source, be more secure for development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(source, be secure)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(source, be more secure for development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(source, is more secure)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(source, be more secure for development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(source, be more secure)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(source, be more secure for development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(source, be considered more secure)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(source, be more secure for development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(source, be more secure for development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(source, be more secure for development)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(source, be more secure for development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(source, be more secure for development)